Those "easy" tickets that pile up in your backlog are costing you more than you think. Here's the real math — and how to clear them.
Synlets Team
Product
January 19, 2026
6 min read

Open your Jira board right now. Scroll past the current sprint. Look at the backlog.
How many tickets are sitting there that would take a developer a few hours to knock out? Bug fixes with clear reproduction steps. Small feature requests. Test coverage gaps. Documentation updates.
Now ask yourself: how long have they been there?
Weeks? Months? Some probably have cobwebs.
These "easy" tickets are costing you more than you think.
That minor bug reported three months ago? By now, two other features have been built on top of the buggy code. What was a 2-hour fix is now a day-long refactor.
Every week a ticket sits in your backlog, the fix gets more expensive. Dependencies grow. Code evolves around the problem. The developer who understood the context has moved on to other things.
Users notice. That "low priority" UI bug they reported? They check back every week. After a month, they stop reporting bugs. After two months, they start evaluating alternatives.
The cost isn't in the fix. It's in the silence that follows when users stop believing you'll listen.
Nothing kills morale like a growing backlog. Your team sees 200 open tickets and thinks "we'll never catch up." So they stop trying to stay on top of it.
The backlog becomes background noise. Important tickets get lost in the pile.
Half your sprint planning is shuffling the same tickets between "this sprint" and "next sprint." Everyone knows those routine tickets won't get done. But you go through the motions anyway.
It's not that they're hard. It's that they're never urgent enough.
Your engineers are working on:
Against those priorities, "add input validation to the settings form" will never win. It's important, not urgent. So it sits. And sits. And sits.
Let's say you have 50 routine tickets in your backlog. Each would take a developer 2-4 hours.
Cost of doing them:
Cost of not doing them:
The longer you wait, the more expensive they get.
This is exactly what Synlets Project Agents are built for. Routine, well-defined tickets that follow established patterns.
How it works:
synlets or ai-agent)What agents handle well:
What stays with your team:
Here's a practical approach to clearing your backlog with AI agents:
Week 1: Triage
Week 2: Scale
Week 3: Cruise
Week 4: Maintain
The goal isn't just clearing old tickets. It's changing the dynamic.
Instead of a backlog that grows faster than your team can handle, you have an AI teammate that absorbs the routine work as it comes in. Your engineers stay focused on the hard problems. Routine tickets get done the same week they're created, not the same quarter.
Your backlog stops being a graveyard and starts being a queue that actually moves.
Those 50 tickets in your backlog aren't going to fix themselves. But they don't need your best engineers either.
Keep reading:
More from the blog
Synlets vs Cursor: AI Agents That Ship PRs vs an AI Code Editor
Synlets vs OpenClaw: Managed AI Agents vs Self-Hosted Open Source
© 2026 Synlets. All rights reserved.